Christelle's blog

Care Not Always As Safe As Houses

Content: 

Why leaving belongings in a car overnight can leave your clients exposed.

For many clients, their motor vehicles are an extension of their homes – a place where they feel safe and comfortable. As a result, it is a common mistake made by many to simply leave certain belongings in the car overnight believing that they will be safe until the morning.
 
According to a recent survey conducted by Allianz Insurance, drivers in the UK leave up to £3-billion worth of belongings in their cars overnight. Even more worrying, over half of these drivers do not lock their car while they are sleeping. In South Africa, we tend to be far more cautious on the issue of theft and safety, as a result of our high crime rate. However, the reality is that many clients do still leave belongings overnight in their vehicles, and sometimes on full display to potential burglars.
 
At MUA, we receive a number of claims for items that have been stolen from our client’s motor vehicles. In fact, these claims have increased markedly following the recent criminal ‘trend’ of thieves interfering with the remote control locking of vehicles, an issue I raised in a recent RISKSA column. Motorists press their remotes believing they have locked their vehicle. However, interference – deliberate or otherwise – by third party remotes being pressed at the same time reportedly interferes with the locking process leaving the vehicle open and exposed to petty criminals.
 
The problem for the insurance industry in these cases is that signs of forced entry are usually required by the insurer in order to show that the vehicle was broken into. If there is no sign of forced entry then the insurer must work on the assumption that the client simply failed to lock the car. In doing so, any claim would be rejected as the client failed to act with due care and diligence.
 
The advice may not be new but it is certainly worth repeating. Clients must ensure that when they leave their vehicle it is securely locked. If this involves going back to the vehicle to double check, then advise them to do so as failure to do this may leave them at risk of having a claim repudiated.
 
Often, the types of claims that would arise from belongings being left in a vehicle are small items such as sunglasses, GPS navigation systems, iPods, laptops and bags with personal possessions. However, while these items may be small they can often prove very expensive to replace.
 
It is also advisable to remind clients that unless belongings that have been left behind in a vehicle were hidden from view, it is highly likely that such a claim may be repudiated. In South Africa especially, terms and conditions stipulated by most insurers insist that belongings not be left on display.
It is also important that clients are made aware of the fact that this general restriction often applies regardless of whether the client has unspecified all risks cover in place, as such a theft would be seen as negligence on the part of the client.
 
In order to ensure that a claim will be covered most insurers will insist clients keep items left in an unoccupied car within a locked compartment such as a cubby-hole or boot. If the vehicle does not have a boot in which bigger items may be stored away, then it is possible that an additional excess will also apply.
 
The best advice, however, is to ensure that any expensive and/or sentimental belongings are not kept in a vehicle at all. The next time you do speak to your client, it may be an idea to ask them to consider what items they regularly leave in their vehicles overnight and explain to them the risks of doing so.
 
Please visit the MUA poll on the RISKSA website to complete the anonymous questionnaire about whether you or your clients have ever left expensive belongings in a car overnight. The exciting results will be revealed in a few weeks via the media and newsletter. To complete the poll visit www.risksa.com
For many clients, their motor vehicles are an extension of their homes – a place where they feel safe and comfortable. As a result, it is a common mistake made by many to simply leave certain belongings in the car overnight believing that they will be safe until the morning.
 

Consumers Uncertain Over Cover For Pothole Damage

Content: 
Government recently announced it was aiming to tackle the issue of pothole damage on the country’s roads with a new R150m initiative by the Department of Public Works starting in March. However, while this is a positive step in beginning to resolve the issue, many consumers remain uncertain about whether or not their insurance policy covers them for damage caused by potholes.
 
According to Christelle Fourie, Managing Director of MUA Insurance Acceptances, if a motor vehicle is insured on a comprehensive basis then any damage arising from potholes would normally be covered, however there are some exceptions that motorists should be aware of.
 
“An increasing number of insurance contracts have an exclusion which stipulates that damage to tyres, and in some instances damage to rims of car wheels, are not covered if the damage arises from road hazards and potholes, except where the damage is as the result of an accident which also causes damage to other parts of the insured vehicle.”
 
Fourie says that in effect this means that if the only damage caused by a pothole is to the tyres of the vehicle then the insured would often have to fund this cost themselves. “It is advisable for the motorist to speak to a broker about this as there are specialist insurance products on the market that insure tyres for loss or damage without any onerous terms and conditions.
 
“If a consumer finds that their insurance policy does not cover such damage then in some cases it might actually make more sense economically to repair, rather than replace the rims, however this will depend heavily on the extent of the damage caused.”
She also cautions that if a vehicle is still under manufacturer warranty, then it is essential to always clear this with the manufacturer first, as repairs may sometimes invalidate the terms of the warranty.
 
She says damage caused by potholes can vary considerably depending on the severity of the accident and the type of vehicle involved, as well as the type of rims and tyres fitted on the car. “There is no way to assess how much pothole damage may cost, however, if a BMW X5 had damage caused to all four rims and tyres, then the bill could easily run to more than R30 000!”
 
“Even if the policy does cover pothole damage it is also important to remember that regardless of fault, the consumer would still be eligible to pay the basic excess, which in some instances could run into a couple of thousand Rand or more, as well as the adjustment on their claim free group which would result in an increase in insurance premiums.”
Government recently announced it was aiming to tackle the issue of pothole damage on the country’s roads with a new R150m initiative by the Department of Public Works starting in March. However, while this is a positive step in beginning to resolve the issue, many consumers remain uncertain about whether or not their insurance policy covers them for damage caused by potholes.
 

Gender Ruling Unlikely To Affect SA Motorists

Content: 
The recent court ruling at the court of justice of the European Union (CJEU) that will ban insurance companies from offering cheaper car insurance to women on the basis of their gender from December 2012 is unlikely to have any implications on the South African consumer in the near future.
 
We support the position stated by the South African Insurance Association (SAIA), which has said South Africa is unlikely to see any impact from the decision as the country’s current legal framework has been drafted to allow for any differentiation that is ultimately beneficial for consumers.
 
Last week, insurance executives in the UK said the ruling could result in female drivers paying as much as 50% more in the cost of insuring their cars, particularly newly qualified drivers.
 
The ruling is ultimately a bad result for the European consumer as it is only likely to impact on young female drivers. Newly qualified drivers tend to pay the most of any demographic as statistically they are more likely to have an accident due to their lack of experience. However, both local and international statistics show that young men have more frequent and more serious accidents than women, hence the reason for the massive discount for their female peers.
 
Many of the European insurers affected by this ruling, have said it is highly unlikely that this ruling will lead to a reduction in insurance costs for men. The premiums men pay accurately reflect the risk they pose, so all that will happen is that women will lose out by paying more and men will gain nothing as they will continue to pay the same.
 
Insurance companies use a range of factors when determining the risk profile of a client in order to accurately assess the level of premium they should be paying. This includes not only gender but also their age, their claims history and many other factors. The ratings that are applied to clients are based on actuarial science and are determined on the basis of accurate information collated over a period of time.
 
Taking the European ruling to the logical conclusion would suggest that insurance companies could also not discriminate against younger drivers by charging them more to insure their vehicle, despite the fact that young drivers are statistically also at greater risk of being involved in an accident.
 
While the ruling of the European Union is certainly not binding on South Africa’s insurance industry, it is becoming increasingly apparent that foreign judgments carry persuasive authority, which influences the decisions of our courts and law-makers, so one cannot rule out an impact in the future.
 
For any similar development to take place in South Africa, the Constitutional Court would have to undertake a comprehensive and thorough review, meaning any such change would still be many years away.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Be ready for the introduction of AARTO

Content: 
The introduction of Aarto (Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act) and the consequent points demerit system is scheduled for 1 April 2011 following pilot projects in Johannesburg and Tshwane. 
 
Under Aarto, all motorists will be given 12 points to start with and will lose points when they commit traffic offences. This will be reflected on the National Contravention Register on eNatis. More points will be lost depending on the severity of the offence, which could eventually lead to the suspension of one's licence.
 
Key points to remember:
  1. Motorists accumulate a set number of demerit points for each prescribed traffic infringement that may lead to suspension or cancellation of your license
  2. Speed will be the number one (1) rate scorer and you must familiarize yourself with the others
  3. Maximum penalty points is 12 and this is when a license is suspended
  4. You are prohibited from driving a vehicle in the suspension period
  5. If a drivers license is suspended three times, the license will be cancelled
  6. You will be required to reapply in terms of the National Road Traffic Act for a license
  7. Serious traffic offences such as driving under the influence, reckless and negligent driving and speeding at extremely high speeds will not fall into the AARTO system, but in the Criminal Procedure Act
  8. AARTO classifies traffic violations under minor and major infringements and offences
  9. Every point over 12 will result in a suspension period of three months
  10. One point means suspension for three months
  11. Two points means six months and three points will go on and on …..
  12. Immediately following a traffic violation you will be issued with an infringement notice(either per hand or post)
 
 
 
 
 

Test the home alarm not the insurance policy

Content: 
Home alarm systems have become increasingly commonplace in South Africa however unfortunately many clients do not realise that their insurance cover may be invalidated for a number of hours every day as a result of the alarm not being set.  Non-compliance with the alarm condition endorsed on the majority of house contents insurance policies is often one of the major reasons insurers repudiate burglary and theft claims.
 
There are of course a number of valid reasons why a home alarm system may not be switched on but it is important all clients are aware that if their insurer requires an alarm or any other home protection device to be installed at the insured premises; that this is always in working order and activated when the property is left unoccupied. If the policy is endorsed with an alarm endorsement, insurers will generally accept no excuse when the property is left unoccupied and the alarm is not set as required.
 
For example, most homeowners do not want to give their alarm codes to their domestic workers even though they do trust them with keys to their homes and allow them to lock up and leave before they get home from work. However, if the property is broken into between the domestic worker leaving and the insured arriving back from work, the loss may not be covered if the alarm was not set.
 
If your client does have a domestic worker but is not willing to divulge their alarm code to them then suggest other options so that they can at least ensure that their home alarm is set at all times. A simple solution is for the client to provide her with a remote control unit to set the alarm once she leaves the house. However, as always, it is important to check the terms and conditions of the underlying policy before providing such advice to your client.
 
We also suggest that policyholders do a full background check on any new employee they allow onto their property. Very often, we find the majority of burglary and theft claims can be traced back to employees of the insured or workers who have been granted temporary access to the property.
 
If it is a requirement for your client to have an alarm installed then it is also important to make sure that the system is tested on a regular basis. It is the responsibility of the policyholder to keep the alarm system in full working condition and if a theft takes place because the alarm was faulty or the back-up battery was flat once again the client runs the risk of having their claim repudiated.
 
There are a few simple steps that clients can take, such as testing the system regularly themselves by activating it on purpose, asking the alarm company to service the system on a bi-annual basis; and switching the electricity off to see if the battery is a working condition.
 
While there are conditions that must be followed, alarm systems are a very important home security tool in South Africa and from a financial perspective, clients can often receive a premium discount from their insurer if they have an alarm system in place.
 
Perhaps even more importantly than the cost saving, however, is the fact that it provides an effective early warning system. An alarm system is one of the best risk management tools available to homeowners in South Africa and the value from a personal safety perspective should not be underestimated.
 
There are a number of other measures clients can take to protect themselves and their property such as burglar bars and security gates; beams in gardens; electric fencing which can also act as an alarm system and Pin Lock sliding doors.
 
Whatever method your client decides to use to protect their home, make sure they are aware that if they specify any protective measures with their insurer these must be turned on and working every time they leave the house.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Understanding your niche is key to a successful business

Content: 
As risk carriers, the insurance industry often sees that the most successful brokers are those who understand exactly what it is they are good at – their unique value proposition – and use this to the advantage of their clients.
 
This is particularly evident within the competitive personal lines insurance market where it has become increasingly important for brokers to identify a chosen niche in which they are comfortable and use these skills and expertise to grow their portfolio. Effective segmentation of a client base also translates directly into improved sales figures and a higher retention of clients. 
 
By segmenting clients and maintaining a focus on a specific niche, brokers can extract the maximum benefit out of their network; establishing themselves and their business, as experts in a particular field; and can start attracting a similar breed of clients, thereby resulting in increased revenue. 
 
Establishing this niche market not only means that marketing and sales efforts are more focused and ultimately more successful, but also that clients are far less likely to move their business if they feel their needs are properly understood.
 
We see this frequently with brokers who specialize in a particular service offering. For example, a broker who specializes in thatch insurance will be far more equipped to understand the risks of their clients and be able to advise them appropriately.  A broker who understands the unique needs of thatched roofed home owners will also be able to provide a client with specialist advice from the time of taking out the policy right through to the event of a fire claim.  Such brokers are also more likely to know the thatching companies and to strike up a relationship for new business referrals to ensure they build a sustainable source of new business leads. 
 
At MUA we have seen this work for a diverse range of client segments.  Some of the top performing brokers are those who have chosen niches such as foreign clients owning homes in SA, high value property home owners or exotic car owners.  These brokers then customise their insurance offerings to suit the needs of their clients. 
 
In addition to the obvious sales benefits of catering to a niche client base, the insurance industry – brokers and insurers alike – will soon be obliged to change the manner in which we conduct our business to be customer-centric through initiatives such as the Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) principles launched by the FSB. 
 
With the opportunity that a specialized service offering presents, there are also challenges that brokers need to be cognizant of. However, it is important to realize that challenges posed by a particular niche can actually prove to be a strength for a business and form an important part of a broker’s strategic differentiator. 
 
For example, high net worth clients demand personal attention and very quick turnaround times, particularly on claims.  Gearing your business model to be able to meet these needs provides an opportunity once again to differentiate your service offering from others around you.
 
In a world where every aspect of business has become increasingly more compartmentalised and focused, it is vital that brokers meet these changing needs. Those brokers who understand the value of having a truly niche approach are certain to reap the benefits.
 

Understanding The Jewellery Market

Content: 
Insuring jewellery against loss or theft is commonplace in South Africa. Unfortunately most consumers are unaware that the onus to insure their jewellery at accurate replacement values rests on their own shoulders.
 
Dex Kotze, CEO of Jenna Clifford Jewellers, says the replacement value at which one needs to insure their jewellery is directly linked to the Rand/Dollar exchange rate. The reason being that gold trades internationally in dollars and the price fluctuates on a daily basis.
 
“Over the long term, diamonds and other precious gemstones have proven to increase considerably in value and it is vital for the insured to guard against underinsuring assets that generally have an emotional attachment linked to them due to the receiving of jewellery as a gift from a loved one, which later becomes a family heirloom,” says Kotze.
 
In order for an insurer to replace an item, an authentic valuation document is required. Reputable jewellers will only issue jewellery valuations based on actual selling prices of items. Unfortunately the retail industry is rife with some retail merchants who mark up valuations to counter the discounts passed on to insurers.
 
Kotze says brokers and insurers should guard against the following when assessing a client’s jewellery valuation:
  • Ensure there is a Rand/Dollar exchange rate on the valuation certificate
  • Ensure the date of purchase or evaluation is on the valuation
  • Ensure there is a proper description of the jewellery item, with;
    • Specific reference to caratage and weight of gold, 18ct or 9ct
    • Proper identification of precious gemstones and reference to independent laboratory certificates of diamonds
    • Proper reference to the four C’s of a diamond, i.e. colour, cut, clarity and carat
    • Ideally a copy of the purchase invoice should accompany the valuation certificate that is submitted to the broker
  • In the event that a jeweller purely values a client’s jewellery, brokers should ensure that the jeweller that does the valuation is qualified to do so
  • At retail level, not all staff who work in the jewellery industry are qualified to evaluate jewellery. Brokers should ascertain by asking questions to their clients
Syndicate content